|
|
 |
|
Supplementary Materials for the Article:
Geometric Interpretation of Gene
Co-Expression Network Analysis |
|
| |
Steve Horvath#
*
and
Jun Dong#
Department of Human Genetics and Department of Biostatistics,
University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Email: Steve Horvath* -
shorvath@mednet.ucla.edu;
Jun Dong - jundong@ucla.edu;
*Corresponding author
# These authors contributed equally to this work. |
|
|
|
Horvath S, Dong J (2008) Geometric
Interpretation of Gene Coexpression Network Analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 4(8):
e1000117
Link to paper:
PLoS Computational Biology
|
|
Link to talks: PowerPoint Version
PDF version
|
|
The merging of network theory and microarray data analysis
techniques has spawned a new field: gene coexpression network analysis. While
network methods are increasingly used in biology, the network vocabulary of
computational biologists tends to be far more limited than that of, say, social
network theorists. Here we review and propose several potentially useful network
concepts. We take advantage of the relationship between network theory and the
field of microarray data analysis to clarify the meaning of and the relationship
among network concepts in gene coexpression networks. Network theory offers a
wealth of intuitive concepts for describing the pairwise relationships among
genes, which are depicted in cluster trees and heat maps. Conversely, microarray
data analysis techniques (singular value decomposition, tests of differential
expression) can also be used to address difficult problems in network theory. We
describe conditions when a close relationship exists between network analysis
and microarray data analysis techniques, and provide a rough dictionary for
translating between the two fields. Using the angular interpretation of
correlations, we provide a geometric interpretation of network theoretic
concepts and derive unexpected relationships among them. We use the singular
value decomposition of module expression data to characterize approximately
factorizable gene coexpression networks, i.e., adjacency matrices that factor
into node specific contributions. High and low level views of coexpression
networks allow us to study the relationships among modules and among module
genes, respectively. We characterize coexpression networks where hub genes are
significant with respect to a microarray sample trait and show that the network
concept of intramodular connectivity can be interpreted as a fuzzy measure of
module membership. We illustrate our results using human, mouse, and yeast
microarray gene expression data. The unification of coexpression network methods
with traditional data mining methods can inform the application and development
of systems biologic methods.
|
-
Robustness Analysis of the Brain Cancer Gene Co-expression Network (Download)
-
Robustness Analysis of
the Mouse Gene Co-expression Networks (Download)
-
Robustness Analysis of
the Yeast Gene Co-expression Networks (Download)
-
Brain Cancer Network
Comprised of the 500 Genes with Highest Absolute Correlation with Brain
Cancer Survival Time (Download)
|
|
|
|
We acknowledge grant support from 1U19AI063603-01,
P50CA092131, 1U24NS043562-01, 5P30CA016042-28, and HL28481. We are grateful for
discussions with Andy Yip, Lora Bagryanova, Dan Geschwind, Peter Langfelder,
Tova Fuller, Jake Lusis, Tom Drake, Paul Mischel, Stan Nelson, Mike Oldham, Anja
Presson, Lin Wang, and Nan Zhang.
|
|
Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Page
|
| |